Men are pigs. Physicists doubly so.

I found an interesting quote here a few months back. It has got to be the most staggering example of a complete misunderstanding of, well, pretty much everything. It discusses the fact that Physics is much more successful in modelling the behaviour of solids than of fluids. This should be obvious to anyone with basic understanding of elementary school Physics.

The page explains: "According to the psychoanalyst and feminist thinker Luce Irigaray the difficulty with turbulence is not mathematical nonlinearity but the fact that research in physics is mainly performed by men."

The privileging of solid over fluid mechanics, and indeed the inability of science to deal with turbulent flow at all, [Luce Irigaray] attributes to the association of fluidity with femininity. Whereas men have sex organs that protrude and become rigid, women have openings that leak menstrual blood and vaginal fluids. … These idealizations are reinscribed in mathematics, which conceives of fluids as laminated planes and other modified solid forms. In the same way that women are erased within masculinist theories and language, existing only as not-men, so fluids have been erased from science, existing only as not-solids.

Source: Hayles, N. K. (1992) Gender encoding in fluid mechanics: masculine channels and feminine flows. Differences: a journal of feminist cultural studies. 4 (2), 16 – 44.

I tried to track down Hayles’s original paper, without success. I guess I should be relieved that no college within the University of London subscribes to publications of this academic quality. Nonetheless, if someone can get a hold of this, I would love a copy!

Posted in Misc | Tagged | Leave a comment

Even more accurate predictions!

From the Telegraph:

Jonathan Cainer, a leading newspaper astrologer, said the changes [in planet classification] did not undermine his work and that of fellow practitioners.

“We astrologers have long known and been predicting the announcement of new planets,” he said last night.

“These changes do not mean that the predictions we have been making have been wrong. But they do mean that in future we will be able to make predictions that we would not previously have been able to make.”

“Every time a new celestial body is found, it signals major technological changes, so Pluto coincided with the splitting of the atom and Neptune with the invention of photography.”

“Pluto is traditionally the planet of all things nuclear and disastrous. I predict we will see a discovery that will almost certainly see nuclear fusion becoming viable within the next 18 months.”

Posted in Misc | Tagged | Leave a comment

New music, new challenges

Lately I’ve been mostly listening to jazz. Acid jazz, Nu-jazz, Downtempo and such. As a consequence, I had to widen the ‘track length’ column in my music player. Just so you know.

Posted in Misc | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Everyone must have a view on Web 2.0. This is mine.

There’s an interesting Economist story about the Chinese phenomenon of ‘team buying’. It is an activity whereby a group of people interested in buying, say, electronics meets up at a specified time, goes to a shop and uses the volume of the mob to negotiate a good deal. You know, in the non-violent way.

The reminded me of an earlier musing about the whole Web 2.0 phenomenon. It’s pretty clear that the exciting thing about the new development is the increasing role of the user community in providing content. After all, last.fm is just a database with smart cross-lookups. What makes it revolutionary is the fact that users fill the database with huge volumes of information.

Volume is important. Web 2.0 works because it views the bulk of data, and the unmanageability thereof, as an asset. Tagging might have come about because people are too lazy to use taxonomy and semantic metadata, or because the sheer amount of information made it unrealistic for complicated metadata to be added. The free-form nature of tags means that you’re not guaranteed to find everything relevant to your search. But if there’s enough to choose from, it does not actually matter if you can’t find everything. You just need to find enough.

When you buy a newspaper, you pay for the physical item and the information, but also for the service. This service is that of the newspaper deciding what’s important and preselecting a number of news items that form a mix of topics characteristic for that paper. Similarly, any time you buy something, you also pay the retailer for a service. This is the service of acquiring a set of products, making them available to you in small quantities, and making you aware of them. The retailer’s markup is his price for providing the service.

The "post-information society" changes the status quo. The responsibility of selecting and analysing information is already moving from newspaper editors to a mixture of bloggers, Wikinews-like services, and technology such as RSS feeds. In the same way, team buying makes the traditional retailer redundant. By organising themselves and by using their numbers as an asset, buying teams no longer need to pay to the retailer for finding buyers for his products.

This is what all services in the "post-information society" have in common. It’s the users of the services that provide the meat. But because of that, the number of people using the service must reach some critical mass before the service can be usable. This is in contrast with how the Web used go be. Before, you could run a special interest website for a small group of people. Suddenly, social applications require a larger userbase before they can be useful. Examples exist even in the old Web: eBay works because it’s so huge. There’s always someone who is selling whatever you happen to need.

It remains to be seen how the size requirement affects the range of applications available. Is the future of the Web in a few huge companies?

Posted in Misc | Leave a comment

Lemon curry?

The main benefit of studying computer science for five years in "one of the most prestigious British academic institution[s]" is that you feel slightly superior to a middle-aged sales guy who attended a half-day, Microsoft-sponsored training course at a plush hotel.

A week ago I bought a super-cheap Samsung S600 digital camera from the Surrey Quays branch of Currys.digital, the new high-street name for Dixons. The camera turned out to have a host of problems, so I decided to return it after fighting with it for about a week. It was in perfect condition, clean of any fingerprints, with original batteries intact in box, so I figured I should be able to return it even without a reason.

When I got to Currys, I was directed to a slightly more managerial-looking guy in (I’m guessing) his late thirties. After explaining the three problems I had found in the camera, he decided to focus on one – USB connection problems – and reasoned that if he can get the camera to work on one of their laptops, then obviously there cannot be interconnection problems with any other computers. He wasn’t really convinced that the other two problems (misaligned lens element so that in one corner was hopelessly soft, and infrequent firmware lockups) really mattered.

We had a lively 15-minute discussion during which I tried to avoid having to explain such things as USB interface timing issues while he questioned my academic credentials. Then, one of his alternate personalities suddenly kicked in. He calmly walked to a terminal, checked something in the store database, and then decided that I can, after all, return the item. My guess is he realised they are running low on this bestselling model and wanted to offload my lemon to someone else. The refund process took about a minute, and I walked home with the cautious hope that eventually I might see the refund appear on my card.

High street stores really can’t afford to do this to their customers. The only reason someone would go to a bricks-and-mortar store is that you get good, knowledgeable service. In Currys you’ll be served by a high-school dropout who probably joined the company because the name sounded delicious. This, of course, is a problem with most retailers. As long as sales staff are paid badly, you can’t expect expertise from any store.

But at least most other chains have sensible returns policies. I know Jessops has a fourteen-day no-quibbles returns policy. I’m guessing all DSG group stores (Currys, Dixons, PC World, The Link) have the same "we-know-it’s-shit-and-we-don’t-care" policy. Interestingly, if I had ordered the same camera on the Currys website, I could have gotten free delivery and the right to return the product to my nearest store.

I don’t see myself shopping in Currys in the near future, and I think the store manager at Surrey Quays is happy to hear that.

Posted in Misc | Leave a comment

London hospital trivia

According to the Wikipedia article, St Thomas’s hospital “was described as ancient in 1215 and was named after Thomas Becket – which suggests it may have been founded after 1173 when Becket was canonised. However, it is possible it was only renamed in 1173 and that it was founded when St Mary Overie Priory was refounded in 1100 in Southwark.”

The hospital I’m due to visit next week, Guy’s, was founded “in 1721 as a place to treat ‘incurables’ discharged from St Thomas’.” Nice.

Posted in Misc | Leave a comment

Bread queues are back

Tesco is the largest retailer in Britain, with about 30% market share in UK grocieries. Why is it, then, that Tesco is absolutely hopeless in managing its supply chain. Observe what the bread shelf looks like on a typical Saturday afternoon at a large, 24h supermarket in Surrey Quays, London:

Empty shelves

I know several people who have switched supermarkets, even though Tesco is the closest one. I would, if I had a car.

Posted in Misc | Leave a comment

Site (finally) up

None of my domains have hosted anything useful since a couple of years ago when my Drupal installation died. This is an attempt to get some use out of at least one of the domains.

This site is running my own branch of seedBlogs, based on a version I hacked together for the Finnish Student Society website. seedBlogs is a wonderfully light, PHP-based CMS solution which is trivially easy to add to existing websites.

The site style is based on the original design for the Student Society page (thanks, Pia!) All layout is done using CSS, so the page should be viewable on pretty much any browser.

Please report any problems with the site. If there’s something wrong with the rendering, a screenshot would be useful.

Posted in Misc | Tagged | Leave a comment