<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for q dash m dot org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://q-m.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://q-m.org</link>
	<description>It stands for &#34;my domain is shorter than your domain&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPS receiver for Kenwood TM-D710E by Sander</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/04/gps-receiver-for-kenwood-tm-d710e/comment-page-1/#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=279#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had found the sirfdemo software before reading your most recent reply. I tried setting the speed to 9600 a few times and finally it stuck. Since both rx and tx will be soldered in parallel to the jack on the headunit I will be able to reprogram it that way later. I&#039;m trying to avoid removing the PCB from the headunit but that would make it really easy to solder onto the pads where the jack is connected. From the top side I can solder either to the smd resistors or remove some coating from the two tiny traces I need to connect to. The rx line is particularly cramped.

As an aside I noticed SiRF has been bought and that apparently was an opportunity to wipe all support files from their web site. No sirfdemo software there. I got it from the same site as your link.

I got two of the GPS units at about $17 each so I&#039;m not so worried about bricking one :) Maybe royaltek has its own programming software. Still hoping for a reply from them.

73,

   Sander W1SOP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had found the sirfdemo software before reading your most recent reply. I tried setting the speed to 9600 a few times and finally it stuck. Since both rx and tx will be soldered in parallel to the jack on the headunit I will be able to reprogram it that way later. I&#8217;m trying to avoid removing the PCB from the headunit but that would make it really easy to solder onto the pads where the jack is connected. From the top side I can solder either to the smd resistors or remove some coating from the two tiny traces I need to connect to. The rx line is particularly cramped.</p>
<p>As an aside I noticed SiRF has been bought and that apparently was an opportunity to wipe all support files from their web site. No sirfdemo software there. I got it from the same site as your link.</p>
<p>I got two of the GPS units at about $17 each so I&#8217;m not so worried about bricking one :) Maybe royaltek has its own programming software. Still hoping for a reply from them.</p>
<p>73,</p>
<p>   Sander W1SOP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPS receiver for Kenwood TM-D710E by mpj</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/04/gps-receiver-for-kenwood-tm-d710e/comment-page-1/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator>mpj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=279#comment-13598</guid>
		<description>The fact that it&#039;s talking to your computer is encouraging. Have you checked whether your GPS is in the binary mode instead of NMEA mode? In SiRF mode the NMEA commands will not work.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.falcom.de/support/software-tools/sirf/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SiRFDemo&lt;/a&gt; is a good tool for debugging the GPS. You can also use it to switch between NMEA and binary. It&#039;s easy to not-quite-brick-the-device-but-scare-yourself with it, so read the documentation.

I wonder if one could set the default baud rate to 4800 by flashing the Royaltek unit with some generic, non-Royaltek SiRF firmware. I wouldn&#039;t want to be the first to try it though...

It&#039;s likely the memory backup battery was the reason my GPS lost the settings when I first tried it. It had probably been powered off for quite some time. Now that the battery is full it should probably last for quite a bit longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that it&#8217;s talking to your computer is encouraging. Have you checked whether your GPS is in the binary mode instead of NMEA mode? In SiRF mode the NMEA commands will not work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.falcom.de/support/software-tools/sirf/" rel="nofollow">SiRFDemo</a> is a good tool for debugging the GPS. You can also use it to switch between NMEA and binary. It&#8217;s easy to not-quite-brick-the-device-but-scare-yourself with it, so read the documentation.</p>
<p>I wonder if one could set the default baud rate to 4800 by flashing the Royaltek unit with some generic, non-Royaltek SiRF firmware. I wouldn&#8217;t want to be the first to try it though&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely the memory backup battery was the reason my GPS lost the settings when I first tried it. It had probably been powered off for quite some time. Now that the battery is full it should probably last for quite a bit longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPS receiver for Kenwood TM-D710E by Sander</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/04/gps-receiver-for-kenwood-tm-d710e/comment-page-1/#comment-13597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=279#comment-13597</guid>
		<description>Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I had not considered sirf as a source of documentation oddly enough. Unfortunately the command seems to have no effect so it&#039;s possible RoyalTek did something to the firmware. I hope they respond to my request for help. The docs say that the settings are stored in memory backed sram so depending on how long that battery lasts I can see how this would be an issue. Thanks for the warning. Save a few dollars with a cheap gps unit and spend hours making it work. It&#039;s the ham way! :)

73,

   Sander W1SOP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I had not considered sirf as a source of documentation oddly enough. Unfortunately the command seems to have no effect so it&#8217;s possible RoyalTek did something to the firmware. I hope they respond to my request for help. The docs say that the settings are stored in memory backed sram so depending on how long that battery lasts I can see how this would be an issue. Thanks for the warning. Save a few dollars with a cheap gps unit and spend hours making it work. It&#8217;s the ham way! :)</p>
<p>73,</p>
<p>   Sander W1SOP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPS receiver for Kenwood TM-D710E by mpj</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/04/gps-receiver-for-kenwood-tm-d710e/comment-page-1/#comment-13592</link>
		<dc:creator>mpj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=279#comment-13592</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. The NMEA command is $PSRF100, as documented &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/GPS/NMEA%20Reference%20Manual1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m pretty sure the right string and checksum are:
&lt;code&gt;$PSRF100,1,4800,8,1,0*0E&lt;/code&gt;
...although I recommend you check with the documentation before trying.

My GPS receiver has once reverted back to 19200 after being unpowered for a while. With that in mind, I would suggest that if you integrate the device into the D710 head, leave the RS232 pins accessible in case you need to reconfigure it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. The NMEA command is $PSRF100, as documented <a href="http://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/GPS/NMEA%20Reference%20Manual1.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the right string and checksum are:<br />
<code>$PSRF100,1,4800,8,1,0*0E</code><br />
&#8230;although I recommend you check with the documentation before trying.</p>
<p>My GPS receiver has once reverted back to 19200 after being unpowered for a while. With that in mind, I would suggest that if you integrate the device into the D710 head, leave the RS232 pins accessible in case you need to reconfigure it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GPS receiver for Kenwood TM-D710E by Sander</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/04/gps-receiver-for-kenwood-tm-d710e/comment-page-1/#comment-13590</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=279#comment-13590</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have one of those same GPS receivers and also found it&#039;s stuck i 19200 baud when you first get it. I have it talking to my computer and I was wondering if you could share the command to set it to 4800 baud please? I intend to put the receiver inside my D710 head. When it&#039;s done I can send you a picture to show you were to make the connections.

Thanks and 73,

   Sander W1SOP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have one of those same GPS receivers and also found it&#8217;s stuck i 19200 baud when you first get it. I have it talking to my computer and I was wondering if you could share the command to set it to 4800 baud please? I intend to put the receiver inside my D710 head. When it&#8217;s done I can send you a picture to show you were to make the connections.</p>
<p>Thanks and 73,</p>
<p>   Sander W1SOP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My DIY Brain Stimulation Headset by mpj</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/01/my-diy-brain-stimulation-headset/comment-page-1/#comment-13534</link>
		<dc:creator>mpj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=221#comment-13534</guid>
		<description>A bit on LEDs:

Craig, I used &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.farnell.com/cree/c503c-wan-cbada151/led-5mm-cool-white-24000mcd/dp/1712459&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CREE C503C-WAN-CBADA151&lt;/a&gt; LEDs from Farnell. They used to be available but seem to be discontinued now. Any similarly size and brightness LED should work (or not, as the case may be.)

Dave, I would not stick 1W LEDs in my ears. I suspect Valkee use fibre optic for thermal reasons. A mobile phone (or any handheld device for that matter) can only dissipate about 6W over its whole surface area without getting too hot to handle. With that in mind, would you really want a 1-watt heater in your ear canal?

Finally, I haven&#039;t actually used this thing beyond testing it once or twice, so I can&#039;t comment on how well it performs on me. Like I said, though, having looked at the evidence I&#039;m not too hopeful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit on LEDs:</p>
<p>Craig, I used <a href="http://uk.farnell.com/cree/c503c-wan-cbada151/led-5mm-cool-white-24000mcd/dp/1712459" rel="nofollow">CREE C503C-WAN-CBADA151</a> LEDs from Farnell. They used to be available but seem to be discontinued now. Any similarly size and brightness LED should work (or not, as the case may be.)</p>
<p>Dave, I would not stick 1W LEDs in my ears. I suspect Valkee use fibre optic for thermal reasons. A mobile phone (or any handheld device for that matter) can only dissipate about 6W over its whole surface area without getting too hot to handle. With that in mind, would you really want a 1-watt heater in your ear canal?</p>
<p>Finally, I haven&#8217;t actually used this thing beyond testing it once or twice, so I can&#8217;t comment on how well it performs on me. Like I said, though, having looked at the evidence I&#8217;m not too hopeful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My DIY Brain Stimulation Headset by mpj</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/01/my-diy-brain-stimulation-headset/comment-page-1/#comment-13533</link>
		<dc:creator>mpj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=221#comment-13533</guid>
		<description>Sorry to both of you for my abysmal reply times.

First of all, I have tried to find the posters/papers about Valkee and I can&#039;t say I&#039;m convinced by the evindence. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.valkee.com/uk/Transcranial_Bright_Light_Treatment-IFMAD.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This paper&lt;/a&gt; describes a trial where they tested various power levels of Valkee, they found that &#039;any&#039; light level tested was equally effective -- yet they didn&#039;t test light level zero. Surely the obvious conclusion is that if the light level doesn&#039;t matter, then the effect can be explained by placebo? The rest of the trials seem to address small pieces of a puzzle without daring to make a big claim.

For what it&#039;s worth, the LED system is probably in the lower end of the scale, clocking in at around 1 lumen. But if we are to believe the research, there&#039;s no advantage to boosting the light output by a factor of nine.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109774/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is their &quot;peer-reviewed methodology paper&quot;. It states:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conflict of Interest Statement&lt;/b&gt;
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Almost immediately below, they say:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;Acknowledgments&lt;/b&gt;
[an author of the paper] Markku Timonen is a minor shareholder in Valkee Ltd. [another author of the paper] Juuso Nissilä is a shareholder and CEO of Valkee Ltd. company (Oulu, Finland), which is a producer and developer of the bright light devices for SAD.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m no expert on research methodology, but how do these two statements square up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to both of you for my abysmal reply times.</p>
<p>First of all, I have tried to find the posters/papers about Valkee and I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m convinced by the evindence. <a href="http://www.valkee.com/uk/Transcranial_Bright_Light_Treatment-IFMAD.pdf" rel="nofollow">This paper</a> describes a trial where they tested various power levels of Valkee, they found that &#8216;any&#8217; light level tested was equally effective &#8212; yet they didn&#8217;t test light level zero. Surely the obvious conclusion is that if the light level doesn&#8217;t matter, then the effect can be explained by placebo? The rest of the trials seem to address small pieces of a puzzle without daring to make a big claim.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the LED system is probably in the lower end of the scale, clocking in at around 1 lumen. But if we are to believe the research, there&#8217;s no advantage to boosting the light output by a factor of nine.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109774/" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is their &#8220;peer-reviewed methodology paper&#8221;. It states:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Conflict of Interest Statement</b><br />
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest</p></blockquote>
<p>Almost immediately below, they say:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Acknowledgments</b><br />
[an author of the paper] Markku Timonen is a minor shareholder in Valkee Ltd. [another author of the paper] Juuso Nissilä is a shareholder and CEO of Valkee Ltd. company (Oulu, Finland), which is a producer and developer of the bright light devices for SAD.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert on research methodology, but how do these two statements square up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My DIY Brain Stimulation Headset by Dave</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/01/my-diy-brain-stimulation-headset/comment-page-1/#comment-13363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=221#comment-13363</guid>
		<description>Nice build! 
Finally I found someone else with the same idea - £185 is a little too expensive for something that MIGHT work with simple led&#039;s :)

I made my own a couple of days ago, also with cheap phones and led&#039;s. Mine is a little simpler though without a dimmer, a resistor and directly connected to a 12v adapter. Two bright 15000 mcd led&#039;s serve as lightsources.
I&#039;m thinking about building another one with 1w power led&#039;s because the intensity may not be enough to penetrate the inner parts of the ear and reach the photosensitive parts of the brain. But I will wait and see if the first build is causing any moodshifts. When I use the phones I feel &quot;something&quot;, can be placebo though.

How&#039;s it going with your phones? Noticed any difference in mood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice build!<br />
Finally I found someone else with the same idea &#8211; £185 is a little too expensive for something that MIGHT work with simple led&#8217;s :)</p>
<p>I made my own a couple of days ago, also with cheap phones and led&#8217;s. Mine is a little simpler though without a dimmer, a resistor and directly connected to a 12v adapter. Two bright 15000 mcd led&#8217;s serve as lightsources.<br />
I&#8217;m thinking about building another one with 1w power led&#8217;s because the intensity may not be enough to penetrate the inner parts of the ear and reach the photosensitive parts of the brain. But I will wait and see if the first build is causing any moodshifts. When I use the phones I feel &#8220;something&#8221;, can be placebo though.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s it going with your phones? Noticed any difference in mood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My DIY Brain Stimulation Headset by Craig</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2011/11/01/my-diy-brain-stimulation-headset/comment-page-1/#comment-13155</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=221#comment-13155</guid>
		<description>Cool. Do they work, would be interested in a full parts list including led specs as unsure which to buy. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. Do they work, would be interested in a full parts list including led specs as unsure which to buy. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DIY PID controller for sous-vide by hamish</title>
		<link>http://q-m.org/2010/04/08/diy-pid-controller-for-sous-vide/comment-page-1/#comment-11074</link>
		<dc:creator>hamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://q-m.org/?p=207#comment-11074</guid>
		<description>hello. how did you go programming the REX-C700 pid with the Pt100?
Did ur unit read accurate temp on the pv wen first used or did you have to program it?
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello. how did you go programming the REX-C700 pid with the Pt100?<br />
Did ur unit read accurate temp on the pv wen first used or did you have to program it?<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

